REPORT: TASK FORCE
State of the art of adult
education –
CONFINTEA Follow up
The discussion in the Task Group was
set in the context of establishing meaningful indicators, which could assist in
evaluating the extent to which progress had (or had not) been made towards the
achievement of the objectives agreed at CONFINTEA.
The monitoring project undertaken by
the GEO (Gender Education Office) of ICAE provided a valuable model as a
starting point for the work of the Task Group.
Two underlying principles were
identified by the Group.
·
Seeking information is already an
advocacy act, raising awareness about the diversity of adult learners and the
patterns of their involvement in formal and non-formal education training.
·
Asking questions concerning statistics
(and lack of them) from official national and international agencies and
organizations is an important aspect of democratic participation in civil
society and an appropriate role for an organization such as ICAE. By developing indicators relating to
progress in implementing CONFINTEA objectives, ICAE can play an important role
in keeping the adult learning objectives to the fore with states, and national
and international organizations.
2.
Summary of recommendations
RECOMMENDATION 1
The Task Group recommends that the Executive of
ICAE commission a Working Group to take forward the proposal that ICAE should
play an independent role in monitoring progress towards the achievement of the
CONFINTEA objectives.
(Note- this recommendation carries resource
implications for the Council)
RECOMMENDATION 2
Meaningful qualitative and quantitative indicators
need to be developed around a range of issues including the following, which
were identified in the course of the workshop-
What are the trends in the proportion of GDP
invested in the education and training of adults over the five year period?
What are the trends in the elements of budgets of
other Ministries associated with the education of adults- e.g. Agriculture,
Welfare, Health etc
What information is available on investment in
non-formal versus formal adult education?
What measures, if any, have been introduced to
reduce financial barriers facing adult learners- in particular target groups
such as women, the unemployed, ethnic minority groups, residents of rural
areas?
What levels of investment are being made, and how
has this change, in relation to areas such as paid educational leave,
child-care, travel, fee support etc
Who is participating in what forms of education
and training
Information by sex, age, class, ethnic groups,
rural/urban
Is there evidence of any change in the nature of
the programs available to adults?
To what extent is the specific nature of adult
learners needs being taken into consideration?
What are the patterns in relation to levels of
access to new technologies
RECOMMENDATION 3
A diversity of methodologies is required to obtain
data in relation to both qualitative and quantitative indicators.
Every effort must be made to secure robust
statistical data on financing and participation, with particular emphasis on
(a) trends over time (b) emerging equity gaps, (c) differences between regions
in the context of globalization.
Given resource constraints of ICAE it is suggested
that a fourfold strategy is adopted.
Firstly, ICAE
should draw up an agreed list of data to be requested from the international
statistical agencies.
Secondly, ICAE
networks should be used to provide qualitative information.
Thirdly,
several Ochos Rios Working Groups are engaged in collection of monitoring data
which should be part of this process- in particular, the groups on literacy,
prison education and gender.
Fourthly, use
should be made of the performance indicators in relation to lifelong learning
being developed as part of the current EUROSTAT project.
The Working Group identified a range of other
statistical sources, which are included in the Appendix along with the list of
participants, many of whom indicated their willingness to continue to be
involved in this work.
| Back to the workshop reports index |