IALLA IV -  Cape Town, South Africa, 2008

DEADLINE TO APPLY FOR IALLA: JULY 31, 2008

Call for application

Proposal

Application Form

 

 

 

 

 

  ICAE Academy of Lifelong Learning Advocacy



Participants



We would like to announce that the ICAE Academy of Lifelong Learning Advocacy was oficially launched on July 30, in Buskerud Folkehogskole.

The opening ceremony was chaired by Celia Eccher, ICAE?s Secretary General and counted with the participation of  Anders Werp, Mayor of Ovre Eiker Kommune, Paul B?anger, ICAE?s President ICAE, Sturla Bjerkaker, VOFO`s  Secretary General and Arild Mikkelsen, Principal of Buskerud Folkehogskole.

During the afternoon Anders Werp gave a lecture on?Democracy and local community? and Arild Mikkelsen talked about ?Introduction to Folk High School?..

This three-week training course, that will extend from July 30 to August 18, has the objective to build the skills of educators and social movement activists in supporting adult learning for change. To this end, a group of 20 participants has been formed, composed of adult educators and NGO leaders from the following countries: Cambodia, Canada, Brazil, India, Japan, Lesotho, Mozambique, South Africa, Spain, Tanzania, Uganda, UK, Uruguay and Zimbabwe. This cultural diversity and experience, crucial for collective analysis, is also reflected in convenors and facilitators that participate in this course.

We have been interviewed twice by the local press and we further appeared in local newspapers, because it is a novelty to have an international event taking place in Buskerud Folkehogskole.




We would like to share with you a report made by one of our participants, Salma Maoulidi from Tanzania, telling her experience about the first days at the course.
 

Democratizing approaches to adult learning
 

I am attending a forum organized by the International Council of Adult Education (ICAE) bringing together 20 educators, with state and non-state actors, and activists working in the field of adult and popular education. The aim is not only to foster leadership in the area In socialist Tanzania in the sixties and seventies there was conscious recognition that adult education was our salvation from debilitating ignorance, poverty and disease. Accordingly the government invested in the sector

There was no village or commune without adult education classes or facilities. In fact the concept of adult education was put parallel to the concept of basic education, the aim being affording the population with basic literacy and numerical skills. Adult education would thus cover not only the older generation who under the colonial administration were denied an education but also included the youth who may have missed out on universal primary education (UPE).

This is now a thing of the past not so much because our literacy rates are exceptional but because there is not as much money going into education, particularly post-primary education. Like in many countries adult education in Tanzania is under threat. National budgets to social services have been cut, most of it going into servicing the debt while allocations to education initiatives, particularly adult education initiatives, are dwindling. Internationally too, money is being diverted to other more immediate development priorities including relief and reconstruction efforts of man-made atrocities. Most of these decisions are being made absent popular involvement or sanction being mainly instigated by global financial institutions concerned with economic expediency. 

The discussion at ICAE is not only limited to adult education, which we have understood to mean literacy classes but rather how education can be understood as a lifelong enterprise. The objective is to help generate a broader vision of adult education and lifelong learning within the framework of human rights, developing linkages with the most important globalization issues that are currently affecting the world. Indeed this is crucial considering that over half of the recommendations from UN conferences concern informal and adult education.

This makes sense to me considering I come in into the discussion, not as a traditional educator, but as an activist and a development practitioner who in the course of facilitating development in organizations and in individuals applies approaches that promote participation and reflection. The action-learning circle for instance is vital in facilitating development for change. Particularly valuable in applying action learning is the emphasis on reflection on action and incorporating the learning in a new way of doing in a constant motion of upward movement denoting improvement.

Additionally, my practice and values are constantly being challenged. Like many professionals who spend years learning formulas and then trying to apply them (on trial and error basis) working with communities that engage and question put us in check as to what we can realistically bring to dynamic community processes. Do we have the blue print of development? Are we the critical intermediaries to people?s development by virtue of our education and training? Consequently are we indispensable to people?s participation in development and in other aspect of civic life?
 
So what indeed should be our role in a very politicized global environment where competing interest, some of which escape local attention or are beyond local comprehension threaten our very existence? Many development practitioners and adult educators who are politicized see their role as not only critical, but essential in facilitating community processes. In such a situation they place themselves at the middle of such processes assuming the caretaker role for people?s welfare and futures. The life of the community is thus effectively predicated on an individual, the saviour or expert, who may assume the role of a benefactor or an intermediary, mediating the relationship between citizens with ?others? i.e. the outside. Such a relationship is not developmental. In effect, it is unnatural and destructive as it stifles local initiative and esteem.

I have come to understand this reflecting on my work with organizations, mostly local people?s organizations. I have been struck by their simplicity of purpose and their resilience. Indeed, most grassroots organizations seem to occur almost naturally in their context and continue to exist responding to less visible human need which essentially influenced its existence. Many times this need is not expressed in sophisticated vision or mission statements but is embodied in the spirit in these organizations or indigenous systems of organizing.

A case in point is a women?s support group in Moshi Town that organized itself around community service performed around religious and cultural festivals.  The group has been in existence for over 80 years. One member in her 50?s explained, ?When my grandmother moved here, this organization was already established and involved in Maulid celebrations as well as self help initiatives?.

New members, however, felt that the older women had no vision. They felt the organization needed to move with the times and modernize. They needed to have a clear structure, clear goals and objectives and defined budgets. Clearly, the younger women wanted to turn this ?local? community initiative that balanced the spiritual with community service to a project model initiative that has come to characterize civil society ?development? efforts in Tanzania.

I knew that formalizing the group would kill the invisible magic that was the secret of its continued existence. It was clear that more than formalities brought the women together year after year to continue their tradition of community service. Perhaps there was merit in the younger member?s wanting such giving and action to become more streamlined and on a lager scale. But equally meritious and developmental is acknowledging where the motivation for wanting such change emanated from. In this case, it came from a faction of new members who felt they needed to adapt to the changing face of NGOs, possibly to become eligible for external funding. This would enable them to do bigger things- and hence the possibility of becoming more engaged civically.

Close to this discussion is the role of the adult educators and activists since we appear as intermediaries between the masses and funders, policy makers, enlightened professionals and other interest groups. In the ICAE forum many, particularly from Africa, express concern about the shift and decrease in development financing and its impact on local organizations to organize thereby limiting local ability to nurture a robust civil society.

For me, in a way, the very association implied in the question embeds deep contradictions- that local organizing should be dependent on external financing; and that funding, not a shared cause and support from the masses should be the object of a robust civil society. What then does this mean for practitioners and facilitators of adult education?

I think the key question rests on how we perceive not only our roles but also the abilities of citizens who happen to be adult learners. Placing ourselves firmly at the center as intermediaries suggests that we are not only prejudice but also patronizing in how we deal with those we perceive as being less ?educated? in the formal sense. It is a value judgment on the relevance of what we know and what we have learnt in mainstream pedagogy. In effect, it dismisses the lived experience and wisdom acquired through informal and non-formal education systems. It suggests that citizens don?t know and can?t make choices without our ?enlightened? interventions.

Critical pedagogy should be about raising and heightening consciousness, and not about directing and intervening. At the end of the day, if we want communities to be truly empowered, something we can gage by their free and informed exercise of choice, we should be in a position to trust that left on their own they can decide on a course best suited for the future they envision independent of our mediation. Only then can we truly be seen to advocate for and support adult learning for active citizenship.


We would like to share with you a report made by one of our participants, Salma Maoulidi from Tanzania

By Salma Maoulidi
Tanzania
smlidi@yahoo.com
 

Adult Education and Democracy
 

In the first week of September of each year, most countries, at least those that still value learning, mark Adult Learning Week. Internationally, this event will be in Africa this year. Archie Mokonane, chairperson of the Gauteng Province Council for Adult Training and Education informs that South Africa will be host to hundreds of delegates from different parts of the world representing institutions and activists engaged in promoting learning throughout life.

What is spectacular about this one may ask? For one, many of us in the developing world seem to have forgotten the importance of learning through out life, especially when we are adults. Indeed, as parents we only consider educating our children on the pretext that ?it is their time, ours has passed?. As workers we tend to think this is relevant for those who have never been to school as we already have the certification that proves we ?qualify? for the job market.

In most developing nations, a lot of attention is on formal education at the elementary level forgetting that adults equally need to be educated so that they are better placed to support their children?s learning. The result is debilitating where people?s learning is confined to specific time and spaces, in our context in poorly equipped classrooms without the chance to further that learning beyond the classroom. Thus, instead of bridging the communication gap across generations, the education model being enforced intensifies the same. No wonder the ageing population fails to understand what is happening around them while the youth barely comprehend the nostalgia the aged have for old systems and values in shaping the being and society.

Unquestionably, we are a community divided not only by religion, class, political affiliation and ethnicity but also by age. As we experiment with pluralism, we can?t undervalue the role of education in contributing to enlightened and informed citizenry. According to Carol Ano of the UNESCO Institute for Education (UIE) is as an impetus for democracy.  Jacob Erle, from the International Academy of Education and Democracy (IAED) relates Adult Education to increasing citizens? ability to participate in democratic spaces particularly in politics and governance either individually or as part of a group e.g. civil society. ?This is why?, says Celita Eccher, Secretary General of the International Council for Adult Education (ICAE), ?it is critical to advocate actively for the right to learn throughout one?s life at national and international levels?. 

Nordic countries have long understood the benefits of investing in life long learning. Governments in the region invest highly in Adult Education programmes and their economies and citizens are reaping the benefits. Other than being models of active citizen democracy, they lead in human development indices. Sweden and Norway use adult education as a way to solve development challenges such as unemployment. Both countries are implementing competence reforms intended to upgrade skills of the workforce to meet the needs of a fast changing labour market.

Through out Scandinavia study circles are part of the Nordic culture, enabling citizens, particularly older citizens, to pursue courses in crafts, culture and academe and hence lead rich and productive lives past official retirement. Folk schools are also widespread for those who have completed their basic education. Tanzania adopted the concept of Folk Schools with generous support from the Danes, but in the last decade we have witnessed the closure, or neglect, of most Folk Schools.

Folk Schools are in crisis Denmark and this has spilled over to Tanzania particularly with regards to the withdrawal of funding to Folks Schools. Some activists in the region attribute it to the change in government. In Sweden on the other hand Folk Schools are thriving, as are study circles probably as Ms. Britten Mansson-Wallin Secretary General of the Swedish National Council of Adult Education because, ?Adult Education is a way of engaging?.

How are we engaging with adult learning in Tanzania?

Article 11 of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania provides for the right to learn and puts duty on state to ensure right to work, self-education and social welfare for citizens. According to the article, the right to education unlimited to field of vocation and includes vocational and other institutions of learning. Article 20 recognizes the right to association while Article 21 grants every citizen the right to participate in public affairs and governance of the country. One of the most direct way citizens can do this is by working and holding office which rights is recognized under Art. 22. Participating in democratic spaces is the only way by which citizen?s can claim their constitutional and legal rights. In this way, the right to learn is central in realizing to social inclusion and extends beyond the concern with cognitive abilities but providing learners with social competencies.

In sum, the Tanzania constitution envisages an active citizenry. One of the ways this constitutional intent can be put into practice is by creating an environment for broader and meaningful citizens participation. Promoting the right to learn is thus critical. Whereas the Tanzania Government has committed itself to a number of regional and international treaties that recognize the right to learn, and whereas in line with the constitution a number of policies are in place to guarantee every citizen the right to learn, as we mark Adult Learning Week, this is an opportune moment for us to ask how far the government has met its obligation in so far as realizing the right to learn for all Tanzanians?

Indeed, the policy framework is in place to support Adult learning. In fact, the Education Policy includes Adult Education as part of non- formal education and training. It also provides that, ?Continuing education shall be an integral part of the education system?. Further, it states that, ? Univerasl Adult Literacy shall be accessible to All Adults. Basic literacy, post literacy and functional literacy programmes shall constitute essential components of the educational sysytem?. The Education Act directs all educational institutions in Tanzania to be designated Centers for Adult Learning. We are yet to establish how far this has been realized.

The Institute of Adult Education, working under the Ministry of Education and Culture, is entasked to design, develop and make available and monitor the curricula for literacy, post literacy and functional literacy programmes. Functional Literacy Programmes to be designed and developed in response to the socio-economic needs of neo-literates. In this respect national literacy tests are to be conducted every three years to improve national literacy levels. Moreover the Ministry responsible for teacher education is to train a cadre of Adult Education  teachers and tutors.

When this proviso was implemented with some seriousness Tanzania saw one of the highiest literacy levels not only in the continent but also in the world. This is no longer the case with increasing levels of illiterates, most being children and youths leaving school functionally illiterate. The bulk of the illiterate population remains those who never had the fortune to attend school; or those who studied under systems that are not part of our colonial educational legacy. The continued presence of an uneducated or poorly educated class is a liability not only for development but to the notion of social inclusion and active citezenship. 
 

Towards making Life Long Learning a priority in Tanzania
 

Consequently, while there are favourable policies in place to facilitate adult learning there is a big discrepancy between policy statements and actual practice. Currently, the impetus, in terms of policy and budgetary allocation, is in the formal education sector. Also, there appears to be little coordination between institutions providing AE services limiting the possibility of mainstreaming Adult Education in development programmes. The little that is being done in the guise of non-formal education is largely experimental and focuses on the seven to nineteen year olds to the exclusion of others i.e. adults.

Moreover, there is poor collaboration between national and district structures and government and non-governmental institutions providing Adult Education programmes and how the same is to be mainstreamed as a development imperative. Adult Education is consistently left out of official education reporting even among education networks though acknowledged as part of the education system. Meanwhile, alternative channels for non/informal education are under-developed including ICTs, trade schools, traditional institutions and local governance structures.
Increasingly there is now wide recognition that gender is a cross cutting issue. However gender is still perceived in a fragmented manner, emphasizing the numerical gains with little assessment of the impact interventions have had on existing structures and attitudes. The same seems to be the case of adult education. Clearly, there is need for skills in integrating AE concerns in development plans, initiatives to make it a key consideration in development monitoring. In particular, there lacks an in-depth analysis of gaps that exist between knowledge and practice. It is therefore difficult to gauge the role of continuing education in people?s increased awareness and participation since the only variable measured in most data is primary school education and post primary education not informal and non formal education.

Thus while Tanzania has high levels of adults who know about HIV/AIDS, the reality is that the life skills necessary to enable the population fight the menace are appalling. According to the Tanzania Reproductive and Child Health Survey (TRCHS) of 1999 only 4% of women use of condoms while a 2003 AYA study puts the figure at less than 1 % suggesting that female youths are not only engaging in unprotected sex at an early age but also at risk of unwanted pregnancies and STIs/HIV/AIDS. The disconnect between HIV knowledge and safe sex practices makes Adult Education more than relevant for the wider population. Further, it can explain the poor linkage between macro economic performance and the poverty situation.
 
Manifestly, the government needs to reconsider it priorities. The bulk of budgetary expenditure is presently going into infrastructure - buildings, roads and equipment. In past years Adult Education is not emphasized as a development priority nor as a cross cutting issue providing the impetus for development. While the government is committed to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and accordingly has incorporated most of the MDGs in the PRSP, the fact remains that these goals focus more on elementary education not Adult Education. Very little is channeled to skills and resources needed to support mainstreaming of Adult Education including literacy and skill development. This raises key concerns as to the ability of the Tanzania Government to ensure Education for All come 2015. Hence, absent due consideration the very policies meant to improve citizen participation and enlightenment seem to undermine Universal Adult Education.

I believe that enough structures exist under the current policy framework provides to enable Adult Education and its related activities. This however requires policy makers and bureaucrats as well as development practitioners to engage differently with the concept of life long learning. For example, most policies now provide for citizen participation in implementation. Thus in the case of the Water Policy, water committees set up at local levels require citizens to be imparted with technical skills in maintaining water pumps or water sources. Also the link is made with related knowledge such as on health since most childhood deaths are on account of waterborne diseases. Likewise, the Transport Policy recognizes the role of citizens in contributing to and maintaining roads. In both instances communities are expected to manage funds towards that purpose, something that is beyond the basic numeracy skills.

In effect, most policies, sectoral and otherwise, in place afford opportunities under which communities can learn together in a relevant and holistic manner, far more advanced and democratic than the traditional adult education classes, which confined themselves to basic literacy and numeracy skills. In the same breath the nation stands to gain from the wide array of experiences and knowledge in place. But how conscious are relevant ministries in making this connection? How many ministries, departments and local governments actually invest in these democratic spaces to promote citizen participation in their projects and in how they work?

To have meaning, democracy must cease to be a fad of the political elite. It has to be entrenched as part of a people?s culture and consciousness. As a key principle in nation building it is reaffirmed in the preamble and in Article 3 (1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. To actualize the concept the Government must provide in addition to the political and economic legal frameworks, an enabling environment for learning via the production, distribution and availability of instructional and learning materials, equipment and libraries for adult and continuing education. Equally pertinent is a high level of investment to the area.

There is an opportunity for civil society and concerned citizens to emphasize the centrality of AE to development in their advocacy by making sure that learning throughout life remains a national development priority. The only way is making the government accountable to meet the goal for Education for All.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

We would like to share with you a report made by one of our participants, Salma Maoulidi from Tanzania

Weaving racism in global protest?

By Salma Maoulidi
Tanzania
smlidi@yahoo.com


While Africa continues to be both the subject and object of numerous global debates, most of which seek to underscore the deep inequalities between developed countries, the ultimate consumers and bastion of markets, with developing nations from whence most unrefined resources emanate, the continent remains disturbingly absent from the map of ?defining moments? and ?actors? in global rights advocacy. Likewise, when one looks at the face of global movements spearheading resistance against multinationals and repressive governments, players from Africa are absent.

I find the fact that Africa is absent from the shakers and makers of global movements disturbing. How is it that African nations, which were so instrumental in ending some of the worst types of atrocities in modern history- colonial occupation and apartheid, now appear far behind in fighting neo colonialism? Indeed, the Liberation struggle for independence or majority rule central to Africa?s political scenario defined international politics and was also instrumental in the formation of global movements such as the non-aligned movement, which included a broad range of stakeholders and issues.

Commenting about the global presence of movements and activists at the biggest global activist forum in modern times, the World Social Forum, Christopher Aguiton from the French organization ATTAC, notes that while South Africa, Senegal and Mali are active in global movements the rest of the continent is unusually silent or absent. For the first time since its inception, this year saw the WSF held outside Latin America with great success. To ?indegenize? the WSF and what it stands for there is talk to also hold the forum in Africa in 2007. But amidst a deafening silence and marked absence, can we contemplate hosting, successfully the WSF or any other major politically significant initiative in Africa?

Africa?s capacity to host an event of the magnitude of the World Social Forum is contestable particularly consider when one the brave bids by a number of African governments for the World Cup as well as the Olympic games. To be considered by the respective bodies, African government had to show ability to host the games with respect to infrastructural capacity. So this is not at issue here. What I do question is the political undertones surrounding ?inclusion? or ?exclusion? of countries deemed substandard or backward.

A case in point is Africa?s bid to host the World Cup in 2006, which was unashamedly compromised by high-ranking officials during the voting process in favour of Germany but back door diplomacy came to bear early this year with FIFA awarding South Africa the 2010 bid. The Olympics, on the other hand are yet to come to the continent and by the high security standards required, it does not seem that any African capital will qualify to host the same, guaranteeing the continent?s participant, not host status, for years to come.

The same could be said with regards to activist forums, which increasingly are taking a global dimension of their own. The 2003 WSF in Porto Alegre attracted 100,000 participants and visitors, while Mumbai attracted 80,000. It is therefore fitting to ask which of our capitals can host a similar number of visitors who need not only lodging facilities but also an efficient transport network and state of the art IT facilities to propagate their advocacy. For sure, South Africa, and some northern African capitals, will continue to dominate in this respect, amplifying the divide (and discontent) with the rest of the continent. The way I see it, with South Africa?s continued dominance economically and facility wise, we will soon not only be referring to the less developed part of Africa as ?South of the Sahara? but perhaps qualifying it further as North of the Zambezi!

As I try to understand the threads that define this pattern of exclusion as it emerges in social movements and other political spaces I weave two patterns- one being historical and the other being parochial. Being a feminist from the south and of African ancestry, I see many parallels between African invisibility (or under representation) in social and political movements with the gender struggle. Indeed, where women are a significant majority in most nations they remain absent from most national and global platforms. Such a situation is unremarkable considering that many women are excluded from the family, the basic space for political contestation. Thus, if women remain invisible at the basic site of participation, it follows that they will be under represented or absent from public processes and spaces thus perpetrating the continued male dominance in global and national structures.

What do I weave into the historical?

Some say that history repeats itself. It is ironic that the historic exclusion of Africans and African nations should demonstrate itself so starkly in movements that promise to build alternative methods of organizing and engaging. But then again, it can explain the remnants of colonial legacy that relegates the continent to insignificance unless to associate it with vices. This invisibility is hard to understand when one considers that many countries in Latin America and Asia were also colonized.

Perhaps to understand why Africa still appears to be lagging behind is the fact African countries never did away with colonialism. Most Latin American countries on the other hand became independence over a century or more ago. Likewise most Asian nations preceded Africa in achieving independence with some going on to launch their own social, cultural and economic revolutions.

Therefore, Africa?s continued experience with colonialism and neo-colonialism may be responsible for a lingering ?recipient? rather than culture of initiating. Her paucity of ?intellectually? inclined activists, denies her of visionary individuals who can shape local and ultimately global agendas. Moreover, an uninspiring culture of activism discourages activists and intellectuals with potential, in some cases chasing them to other fields or continents.

In drawing connections with the historical I think that the issue of race remains a defining factor in social justice movements. Race was an issue in the civil rights movement and it continues to be the defining factor in human rights advocacy, albeit in new ways. Traditional leftist movements, including workers? unions on the other hand challenged inequality on the basis of class something feminists criticized. They believed that a class analysis failed to take into account gender experiences leading to unequal gender relations being replicated in party and union structures. Instead, feminists introduce into the discourse the issue of intersectionality, to understand the different identities of the citizen. The evolution in discourse came from the continuing engagement with tensions of race, class, ethnicity and other diversities within the movement. Indeed, in the late sixties feminism faced a real crisis when black (and to an extent Latino women) broke away expressing that the dominant discourse did not address their realities.

However, such tensions appear novel to current people and mass movements. Indeed, as was the case in the past upper and middle calls white males (and some women) and intellectuals seem to dominate the leadership and advisory spaces of mass movements. Even in Latin America where these movements are strong there is tension between middle class white activists and ?indigenous? or black populations. India expanded the analysis to not only include class, but also caste. The Conference Against Racism and Xenophobia Such amplified existing tensions, which remain fiercely contested. Thus, it may be that the exclusion of Africa, considered the least developed continent, is but following a pattern of supremist assertion.

The bigger question for movements and activists thus remains understanding and achieving inclusion, lest the divide cripples efforts in global action against neo-colonialism and neo liberal policies. More importantly, it is an issue for Africans, particularly African activists who need to show some concern over the state of affairs not only by playing the victim but also by actively changing their engagement culture with the political. Indeed, activism is not only an alternative means of survival, nor is it a fad. It is, in fact, and remains the reaction against emerging and mutating forms of injustice and anarchy. Our willful disrespect of this fact suggests we are willing collaborators of unjust policies and systems. Our continued disengagement, conscious or unconscious, with politicized agendas suggests we concur with the status quo.

Why parochial? For the most part, we have as activists failed to walk the talk in our political culture, in our governance structures and in our inability to connect with the masses something that denies us credibility. Consequently, activism in most African countries is elitist, if not opportunist, being largely the purview of NGO, and to a smaller extent the academe. It is not only class based but defined by age. Thus, whereas Mumbai was a testament to citizen participation with the majority of participants coming from rural India and from neighboring countries, the delegations from African countries, including Tanzania were ?well placed? middle class activists. Likewise, the presence of youths- be they volunteers or delegates in the Youth Forum at the WSF was breathtaking while the youth delegation from Tanzania, included middle age persons!

In a way, this reflects the state of Civil Society in most African countries and especially Tanzania, a context I am more familiar with. When one tries to identify civil society in Tanzania; or the shapers and shakers in civil society, it amounts to a handful of ever-present and over saturated individuals. At the end there is not much variety in terms of composition or content in the different activist circles as well as emerging alliances. Increasingly the ?long timers? have given the term ?exclusion? new meaning with some claiming the role of the ?God Father? empowered to endorse less popular or emerging actors on behalf of donors; or simply to preserve their dominance in a ?chic? sector.

This lack of diversity, depth and daring is paradoxical in a sector that sees itself as instrumental in promoting and upholding democratic ideals.  Increasingly it is not surprising to find civil society organizations in Tanzania replicating some of the vices attributed to governments- nepotism (in the form of regionalism and sectarianism), favoritism, high overhead and undemocratic leadership. In some cases, visionary leaders have no support within their organizations, their constituents still suffering from the hangover of the welfare state, where the state and the charismatic leader did it all. At best, the masses will whine and criticize about the excesses they perceive committed by their leaders yet given a chance no one is ready to make the sacrifices that will propel them to significance.

Thus many committed leaders in the continent experience abandonment, even when they champion causes others supposedly share. Undoubtedly, activist organizations and social movements failure to connect with the masses raises key questions about how we practice participatory development for social transformation. In such a scenario what added value do we then bring to practice of alternative organizing and horizontal leadership? More importantly if this is our reality how then do we propose to garner the capacity not only to participate at the global scale, but also to shape and host global action?
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

ICAE ACADEMY OF LIFELONG LEARNING ADVOCACY

Reflections on ICAE's Academy of Lifelong Learning Advocacy
by Paul Belanger - ICAE President
belanger.paul@uqam.ca

The first ICAE Academy for Lifelong Learning Academy finished last August 18th.

We are very satisfied to have been able to make this international training project come true as well as to count with the attendance of key participants such as adult educators, members of organizations and networks from different regions around the world that constitute a strong and powerful group which allow to plan future actions at national, regional and international level. Twenty participants from Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and Canada did participate, coming from 15 countries. They worked very hard for three full weeks.
 
We also benefited from resources person coming from Europe, Latin America, Asia, UNESCO and the European Union, who, through their key inputs and knowledge, contributed to the development and achievement of the objectives of this course, as well as to enrich and promote the exchange of ideas among participants.

The objective of this residential programme on advocacy for adult learning was to help educators and social movement activists strengthening their skills in supporting adult learning for change, and, also, to consolidate ICAE as a global network committed to that end. We wanted to support the emergence of a new leadership for the global network of adult educators, and to secure the regeneration of ICAE and to enhance ICAE?s networking capacity as a global team committed to the right to learn of women and men.
 
The programme was structured around three major thematics corresponding to each of the three weeks:

First week, we worked to generate and share a broader vision on adult education within the framework of human rights, developing linkages with the most important globalization issues and actions ( the World Social Forum, in particular)  that are currently affecting the world.

Second week, we focused our work on the necessity and methodology of monitoring of the right to learn, referring to the different data sources available at global (e.g. Beijing; Dakar; CONFINTEA, MDG), regional and national levels.

Third week, the focus has been the creative Participation and Strategies for Advocacy at all levels and the strengthening of advocacy network and, in particular, of ICAE and its networks.

Looking back at the expected outcomes, ICAE has all reasons to be satisfied:
* 20 potential leaders have been initiated to global teamwork and advocacy on lifelong learning and adult learning,
*
Enrichment of ICAE?s  broader vision on adult education related to world?s social issues,
*
Sensitized participants to the commonalities and the diversity of the specific  experience brought at this Academy: in literacy, health education, citizenship education, gender justice, popular and citizenship education, advocacy for adult learning policy, adult learners week, etc.,
*
Concrete practice of skills to build and present arguments for evidence-based advocacy and this in each participant specific national context

* Identification of new and tested strategies and approaches to influence policy and policy makers, using old skills in new ways,
* Concrete exploration with participants to work in intersectoriality with other collective actions, which is certainly the most difficult challenge for adult educators.

The type of ICAE that we are building together is one that requires the exchange and competencies that we have intensively practiced during this three weeks seminar

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

THE IALLA EXPERIENCE

by Arild Mikkelsen
Principal of Buskerud Folk High School, Norway

The IALLA-experience

Buskerud Folk high school had the honour to host the first ICAE Academy of Lifelong Learning Advocacy. This was a great experience to us in many ways.  To meet people from all corners of the world is always exciting and inspirational.  The participants of this IALLA-conference brought with them a lot of deep reflections, courage, ideas for the future, and not to forget humour and songs, and turned our school into a place of excitement and good vibrations.

Our school is situated on the peaceful countryside of Norway, people from more urban places in the world might characterise Darbu as a rather sleepy place.  Most of the folk high schools in Norway are situated in the countryside, in mountain areas and nearby the fjords, very few in the cities.  We were of course anxious about the quietness of our neighbourhood, and thought that somebody might find it boring and dull.  But the themes and lectures of the conference created engagement and action, and the participants worked themselves through three very intensive weeks. 

We had arranged a few excursions to a nearby village to see an art exhibition, to have a four hours boat trip to an old village and to have a good meal there,  a trip to Oslo to meet people in the Educational Ministry, to watch the Vigeland Sculpture Park, and to do some shopping.  In addition we listened to a jazz concert in a nearby medieval church, had a highly professional violin and guitar concert in the sitting room of the school, and concluded the last evening with an outdoor brass band concert which also included dancing in the bright and sunny August evening.  This is meant to be evident proof of the fact that this conference combined heavy work with inspirational music and social experiences, and also proving that the conference became very much folk high school alike.

IALLA made our school important.   The mayor of our municipality opened the conference and gave a lecture, and by doing so strengthened the links between the school and the municipality.  We had journalists from our local newspapers to interview participants and leading persons from the secretariat, and the editor of the Norwegian folk high school magazine spent half a day at the school.  All this is important for the school, making us visible in our municipality in a positive way.  The conference received support both from the municipality and the county, and this was also a useful experience.

To wind up, the conference has above all given the school an international network.  People from all corners of the world have been here, they have heard about us, and have experienced for themselves the life in a folk high school.  The more formal contact with ICAE is also very inspirational for us, and we sincerely hope that the contact might be deepened and strengthened in the future.  Folk high schools need to be pushed out of their Norwegian isolation.  For our school the IALLA-experience reminded us about the challenges that adult learning face in a globalised world, and we are very happy for that reminder.

Arild Mikkelsen
Principal of Buskerud Folk high school 




CALL FOR APPLICATIONS

APPLICATION FORM

PROGRAM