|

DEADLINE TO APPLY FOR IALLA: JULY 31, 2008
Call for application
Proposal
Application Form

ICAE Academy of
Lifelong Learning Advocacy

Participants
We would like to announce that the ICAE Academy of Lifelong Learning
Advocacy was oficially launched on July 30, in Buskerud Folkehogskole.
The opening ceremony was chaired by Celia Eccher, ICAE?s Secretary General
and counted with the participation of Anders Werp, Mayor of Ovre Eiker
Kommune, Paul B?anger, ICAE?s President ICAE, Sturla Bjerkaker, VOFO`s
Secretary General and Arild Mikkelsen, Principal of Buskerud Folkehogskole.
During the afternoon Anders Werp gave a lecture on?Democracy and local
community? and Arild Mikkelsen talked about ?Introduction to Folk High
School?..
This three-week training course, that will extend from July 30 to August 18,
has the objective to build the skills of educators and social movement
activists in supporting adult learning for change. To this end, a group of
20 participants has been formed, composed of adult educators and NGO leaders
from the following countries: Cambodia, Canada, Brazil, India, Japan,
Lesotho, Mozambique, South Africa, Spain, Tanzania, Uganda, UK, Uruguay and
Zimbabwe. This cultural diversity and experience, crucial for collective
analysis, is also reflected in convenors and facilitators that participate
in this course.
We have been interviewed twice by the local press and we further appeared in
local newspapers, because it is a novelty to have an international event
taking place in Buskerud Folkehogskole.

We would like to share with you a report made by one of our participants,
Salma Maoulidi from Tanzania, telling her experience about the first days at
the course.
Democratizing approaches to adult learning
I am attending a forum organized by the International Council of Adult
Education (ICAE) bringing together 20 educators, with state and non-state
actors, and activists working in the field of adult and popular education.
The aim is not only to foster leadership in the area In socialist Tanzania
in the sixties and seventies there was conscious recognition that adult
education was our salvation from debilitating ignorance, poverty and disease.
Accordingly the government invested in the sector
There was no village or commune without adult education classes or
facilities. In fact the concept of adult education was put parallel to the
concept of basic education, the aim being affording the population with
basic literacy and numerical skills. Adult education would thus cover not
only the older generation who under the colonial administration were denied
an education but also included the youth who may have missed out on
universal primary education (UPE).
This is now a thing of the past not so much because our literacy rates are
exceptional but because there is not as much money going into education,
particularly post-primary education. Like in many countries adult education
in Tanzania is under threat. National budgets to social services have been
cut, most of it going into servicing the debt while allocations to education
initiatives, particularly adult education initiatives, are dwindling.
Internationally too, money is being diverted to other more immediate
development priorities including relief and reconstruction efforts of man-made
atrocities. Most of these decisions are being made absent popular
involvement or sanction being mainly instigated by global financial
institutions concerned with economic expediency.
The discussion at ICAE is not only limited to adult education, which we have
understood to mean literacy classes but rather how education can be
understood as a lifelong enterprise. The objective is to help generate a
broader vision of adult education and lifelong learning within the framework
of human rights, developing linkages with the most important globalization
issues that are currently affecting the world. Indeed this is crucial
considering that over half of the recommendations from UN conferences
concern informal and adult education.
This makes sense to me considering I come in into the discussion, not as a
traditional educator, but as an activist and a development practitioner who
in the course of facilitating development in organizations and in
individuals applies approaches that promote participation and reflection.
The action-learning circle for instance is vital in facilitating development
for change. Particularly valuable in applying action learning is the
emphasis on reflection on action and incorporating the learning in a new way
of doing in a constant motion of upward movement denoting improvement.
Additionally, my practice and values are constantly being challenged. Like
many professionals who spend years learning formulas and then trying to
apply them (on trial and error basis) working with communities that engage
and question put us in check as to what we can realistically bring to
dynamic community processes. Do we have the blue print of development? Are
we the critical intermediaries to people?s development by virtue of our
education and training? Consequently are we indispensable to people?s
participation in development and in other aspect of civic life?
So what indeed should be our role in a very politicized global environment
where competing interest, some of which escape local attention or are beyond
local comprehension threaten our very existence? Many development
practitioners and adult educators who are politicized see their role as not
only critical, but essential in facilitating community processes. In such a
situation they place themselves at the middle of such processes assuming the
caretaker role for people?s welfare and futures. The life of the community
is thus effectively predicated on an individual, the saviour or expert, who
may assume the role of a benefactor or an intermediary, mediating the
relationship between citizens with ?others? i.e. the outside. Such a
relationship is not developmental. In effect, it is unnatural and
destructive as it stifles local initiative and esteem.
I have come to understand this reflecting on my work with organizations,
mostly local people?s organizations. I have been struck by their simplicity
of purpose and their resilience. Indeed, most grassroots organizations seem
to occur almost naturally in their context and continue to exist responding
to less visible human need which essentially influenced its existence. Many
times this need is not expressed in sophisticated vision or mission
statements but is embodied in the spirit in these organizations or
indigenous systems of organizing.
A case in point is a women?s support group in Moshi Town that organized
itself around community service performed around religious and cultural
festivals. The group has been in existence for over 80 years. One member in
her 50?s explained, ?When my grandmother moved here, this organization was
already established and involved in Maulid celebrations as well as
self help initiatives?.
New members, however, felt that the older women had no vision. They felt the
organization needed to move with the times and modernize. They needed to
have a clear structure, clear goals and objectives and defined budgets.
Clearly, the younger women wanted to turn this ?local? community initiative
that balanced the spiritual with community service to a project model
initiative that has come to characterize civil society ?development? efforts
in Tanzania.
I knew that formalizing the group would kill the invisible magic that was
the secret of its continued existence. It was clear that more than
formalities brought the women together year after year to continue their
tradition of community service. Perhaps there was merit in the younger
member?s wanting such giving and action to become more streamlined and on a
lager scale. But equally meritious and developmental is acknowledging where
the motivation for wanting such change emanated from. In this case, it came
from a faction of new members who felt they needed to adapt to the changing
face of NGOs, possibly to become eligible for external funding. This would
enable them to do bigger things- and hence the possibility of becoming more
engaged civically.
Close to this discussion is the role of the adult educators and activists
since we appear as intermediaries between the masses and funders, policy
makers, enlightened professionals and other interest groups. In the ICAE
forum many, particularly from Africa, express concern about the shift and
decrease in development financing and its impact on local organizations to
organize thereby limiting local ability to nurture a robust civil society.
For me, in a way, the very association implied in the question embeds deep
contradictions- that local organizing should be dependent on external
financing; and that funding, not a shared cause and support from the masses
should be the object of a robust civil society. What then does this mean for
practitioners and facilitators of adult education?
I think the key question rests on how we perceive not only our roles but
also the abilities of citizens who happen to be adult learners. Placing
ourselves firmly at the center as intermediaries suggests that we are not
only prejudice but also patronizing in how we deal with those we perceive as
being less ?educated? in the formal sense. It is a value judgment on the
relevance of what we know and what we have learnt in mainstream pedagogy. In
effect, it dismisses the lived experience and wisdom acquired through
informal and non-formal education systems. It suggests that citizens don?t
know and can?t make choices without our ?enlightened? interventions.
Critical pedagogy should be about raising and heightening consciousness, and
not about directing and intervening. At the end of the day, if we want
communities to be truly empowered, something we can gage by their free and
informed exercise of choice, we should be in a position to trust that left
on their own they can decide on a course best suited for the future they
envision independent of our mediation. Only then can we truly be seen to
advocate for and support adult learning for active citizenship.

We would like to share with you a report made by
one of our participants, Salma Maoulidi from
Tanzania
By Salma Maoulidi
Tanzania
smlidi@yahoo.com
Adult Education and Democracy
In the first week of September of each year, most countries, at least
those that still value learning, mark Adult Learning Week. Internationally,
this event will be in Africa this year. Archie Mokonane, chairperson of the
Gauteng Province Council for Adult Training and Education informs that South
Africa will be host to hundreds of delegates from different parts of the
world representing institutions and activists engaged in promoting learning
throughout life.
What is spectacular about this one may ask? For one, many of us in the
developing world seem to have forgotten the importance of learning through
out life, especially when we are adults. Indeed, as parents we only consider
educating our children on the pretext that ?it is their time, ours has
passed?. As workers we tend to think this is relevant for those who have
never been to school as we already have the certification that proves we ?qualify?
for the job market.
In most developing nations, a lot of attention is on formal education at the
elementary level forgetting that adults equally need to be educated so that
they are better placed to support their children?s learning. The result is
debilitating where people?s learning is confined to specific time and spaces,
in our context in poorly equipped classrooms without the chance to further
that learning beyond the classroom. Thus, instead of bridging the
communication gap across generations, the education model being enforced
intensifies the same. No wonder the ageing population fails to understand
what is happening around them while the youth barely comprehend the
nostalgia the aged have for old systems and values in shaping the being and
society.
Unquestionably, we are a community divided not only by religion, class,
political affiliation and ethnicity but also by age. As we experiment with
pluralism, we can?t undervalue the role of education in contributing to
enlightened and informed citizenry. According to Carol Ano of the UNESCO
Institute for Education (UIE) is as an impetus for democracy. Jacob Erle,
from the International Academy of Education and Democracy (IAED) relates
Adult Education to increasing citizens? ability to participate in democratic
spaces particularly in politics and governance either individually or as
part of a group e.g. civil society. ?This is why?, says Celita Eccher,
Secretary General of the International Council for Adult Education (ICAE), ?it
is critical to advocate actively for the right to learn throughout one?s
life at national and international levels?.
Nordic countries have long understood the benefits of investing in life long
learning. Governments in the region invest highly in Adult Education
programmes and their economies and citizens are reaping the benefits. Other
than being models of active citizen democracy, they lead in human
development indices. Sweden and Norway use adult education as a way to solve
development challenges such as unemployment. Both countries are implementing
competence reforms intended to upgrade skills of the workforce to meet the
needs of a fast changing labour market.
Through out Scandinavia study circles are part of the Nordic culture,
enabling citizens, particularly older citizens, to pursue courses in crafts,
culture and academe and hence lead rich and productive lives past official
retirement. Folk schools are also widespread for those who have completed
their basic education. Tanzania adopted the concept of Folk Schools with
generous support from the Danes, but in the last decade we have witnessed
the closure, or neglect, of most Folk Schools.
Folk Schools are in crisis Denmark and this has spilled over to Tanzania
particularly with regards to the withdrawal of funding to Folks Schools.
Some activists in the region attribute it to the change in government. In
Sweden on the other hand Folk Schools are thriving, as are study circles
probably as Ms. Britten Mansson-Wallin Secretary General of the Swedish
National Council of Adult Education because, ?Adult Education is a way of
engaging?.
How are we engaging with adult learning in Tanzania?
Article 11 of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania provides
for the right to learn and puts duty on state to ensure right to work, self-education
and social welfare for citizens. According to the article, the right to
education unlimited to field of vocation and includes vocational and other
institutions of learning. Article 20 recognizes the right to association
while Article 21 grants every citizen the right to participate in public
affairs and governance of the country. One of the most direct way citizens
can do this is by working and holding office which rights is recognized
under Art. 22. Participating in democratic spaces is the only way by which
citizen?s can claim their constitutional and legal rights. In this way, the
right to learn is central in realizing to social inclusion and extends
beyond the concern with cognitive abilities but providing learners with
social competencies.
In sum, the Tanzania constitution envisages an active citizenry. One of the
ways this constitutional intent can be put into practice is by creating an
environment for broader and meaningful citizens participation. Promoting the
right to learn is thus critical. Whereas the Tanzania Government has
committed itself to a number of regional and international treaties that
recognize the right to learn, and whereas in line with the constitution a
number of policies are in place to guarantee every citizen the right to
learn, as we mark Adult Learning Week, this is an opportune moment for us to
ask how far the government has met its obligation in so far as realizing the
right to learn for all Tanzanians?
Indeed, the policy framework is in place to support Adult learning. In fact,
the Education Policy includes Adult Education as part of non- formal
education and training. It also provides that, ?Continuing education shall
be an integral part of the education system?. Further, it states that, ?
Univerasl Adult Literacy shall be accessible to All Adults. Basic literacy,
post literacy and functional literacy programmes shall constitute essential
components of the educational sysytem?. The Education Act directs all
educational institutions in Tanzania to be designated Centers for Adult
Learning. We are yet to establish how far this has been realized.
The Institute of Adult Education, working under the Ministry of Education
and Culture, is entasked to design, develop and make available and monitor
the curricula for literacy, post literacy and functional literacy programmes.
Functional Literacy Programmes to be designed and developed in response to
the socio-economic needs of neo-literates. In this respect national literacy
tests are to be conducted every three years to improve national literacy
levels. Moreover the Ministry responsible for teacher education is to train
a cadre of Adult Education teachers and tutors.
When this proviso was implemented with some seriousness Tanzania saw one of
the highiest literacy levels not only in the continent but also in the world.
This is no longer the case with increasing levels of illiterates, most being
children and youths leaving school functionally illiterate. The bulk of the
illiterate population remains those who never had the fortune to attend
school; or those who studied under systems that are not part of our colonial
educational legacy. The continued presence of an uneducated or poorly
educated class is a liability not only for development but to the notion of
social inclusion and active citezenship.
Towards making Life Long Learning a priority in
Tanzania
Consequently, while there are favourable policies in place to facilitate
adult learning there is a big discrepancy between policy statements and
actual practice. Currently, the impetus, in terms of policy and budgetary
allocation, is in the formal education sector. Also, there appears to be
little coordination between institutions providing AE services limiting the
possibility of mainstreaming Adult Education in development programmes. The
little that is being done in the guise of non-formal education is largely
experimental and focuses on the seven to nineteen year olds to the exclusion
of others i.e. adults.
Moreover, there is poor collaboration between national and district
structures and government and non-governmental institutions providing Adult
Education programmes and how the same is to be mainstreamed as a development
imperative. Adult Education is consistently left out of official education
reporting even among education networks though acknowledged as part of the
education system. Meanwhile, alternative channels for non/informal education
are under-developed including ICTs, trade schools, traditional institutions
and local governance structures.
Increasingly there is now wide recognition that gender is a cross cutting
issue. However gender is still perceived in a fragmented manner, emphasizing
the numerical gains with little assessment of the impact interventions have
had on existing structures and attitudes. The same seems to be the case of
adult education. Clearly, there is need for skills in integrating AE
concerns in development plans, initiatives to make it a key consideration in
development monitoring. In particular, there lacks an in-depth analysis of
gaps that exist between knowledge and practice. It is therefore difficult to
gauge the role of continuing education in people?s increased awareness and
participation since the only variable measured in most data is primary
school education and post primary education not informal and non formal
education.
Thus while Tanzania has high levels of adults who know about HIV/AIDS, the
reality is that the life skills necessary to enable the population fight the
menace are appalling. According to the Tanzania Reproductive and Child
Health Survey (TRCHS) of 1999 only 4% of women use of condoms while a 2003
AYA study puts the figure at less than 1 % suggesting that female youths are
not only engaging in unprotected sex at an early age but also at risk of
unwanted pregnancies and STIs/HIV/AIDS. The disconnect between HIV knowledge
and safe sex practices makes Adult Education more than relevant for the
wider population. Further, it can explain the poor linkage between macro
economic performance and the poverty situation.
Manifestly, the government needs to reconsider it priorities. The bulk of
budgetary expenditure is presently going into infrastructure - buildings,
roads and equipment. In past years Adult Education is not emphasized as a
development priority nor as a cross cutting issue providing the impetus for
development. While the government is committed to the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs) and accordingly has incorporated most of the MDGs in the PRSP,
the fact remains that these goals focus more on elementary education not
Adult Education. Very little is channeled to skills and resources needed to
support mainstreaming of Adult Education including literacy and skill
development. This raises key concerns as to the ability of the Tanzania
Government to ensure Education for All come 2015. Hence, absent due
consideration the very policies meant to improve citizen participation and
enlightenment seem to undermine Universal Adult Education.
I believe that enough structures exist under the current policy framework
provides to enable Adult Education and its related activities. This however
requires policy makers and bureaucrats as well as development practitioners
to engage differently with the concept of life long learning. For example,
most policies now provide for citizen participation in implementation. Thus
in the case of the Water Policy, water committees set up at local levels
require citizens to be imparted with technical skills in maintaining water
pumps or water sources. Also the link is made with related knowledge such as
on health since most childhood deaths are on account of waterborne diseases.
Likewise, the Transport Policy recognizes the role of citizens in
contributing to and maintaining roads. In both instances communities are
expected to manage funds towards that purpose, something that is beyond the
basic numeracy skills.
In effect, most policies, sectoral and otherwise, in place afford
opportunities under which communities can learn together in a relevant and
holistic manner, far more advanced and democratic than the traditional adult
education classes, which confined themselves to basic literacy and numeracy
skills. In the same breath the nation stands to gain from the wide array of
experiences and knowledge in place. But how conscious are relevant
ministries in making this connection? How many ministries, departments and
local governments actually invest in these democratic spaces to promote
citizen participation in their projects and in how they work?
To have meaning, democracy must cease to be a fad of the political elite. It
has to be entrenched as part of a people?s culture and consciousness. As a
key principle in nation building it is reaffirmed in the preamble and in
Article 3 (1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. To
actualize the concept the Government must provide in addition to the
political and economic legal frameworks, an enabling environment for
learning via the production, distribution and availability of instructional
and learning materials, equipment and libraries for adult and continuing
education. Equally pertinent is a high level of investment to the area.
There is an opportunity for civil society and concerned citizens to
emphasize the centrality of AE to development in their advocacy by making
sure that learning throughout life remains a national development priority.
The only way is making the government accountable to meet the goal for
Education for All.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
We would like to share with you a report made by one of our participants,
Salma Maoulidi from Tanzania
Weaving racism in
global protest?
By Salma Maoulidi
Tanzania
smlidi@yahoo.com
While Africa continues to be both the subject and object of
numerous global debates, most of which seek to underscore the deep
inequalities between developed countries, the ultimate consumers and bastion
of markets, with developing nations from whence most unrefined resources
emanate, the continent remains disturbingly absent from the map of ?defining
moments? and ?actors? in global rights advocacy. Likewise, when one looks at
the face of global movements spearheading resistance against multinationals
and repressive governments, players from Africa are absent.
I find the fact that Africa is absent from the shakers and makers of global
movements disturbing. How is it that African nations, which were so
instrumental in ending some of the worst types of atrocities in modern
history- colonial occupation and apartheid, now appear far behind in
fighting neo colonialism? Indeed, the Liberation struggle for independence
or majority rule central to Africa?s political scenario defined
international politics and was also instrumental in the formation of global
movements such as the non-aligned movement, which included a broad range of
stakeholders and issues.
Commenting about the global presence of movements and activists at the
biggest global activist forum in modern times, the World Social Forum,
Christopher Aguiton from the French organization ATTAC, notes that while
South Africa, Senegal and Mali are active in global movements the rest of
the continent is unusually silent or absent. For the first time since its
inception, this year saw the WSF held outside Latin America with great
success. To ?indegenize? the WSF and what it stands for there is talk to
also hold the forum in Africa in 2007. But amidst a deafening silence and
marked absence, can we contemplate hosting, successfully the WSF or any
other major politically significant initiative in Africa?
Africa?s capacity to host an event of the magnitude of the World Social
Forum is contestable particularly consider when one the brave bids by a
number of African governments for the World Cup as well as the Olympic games.
To be considered by the respective bodies, African government had to show
ability to host the games with respect to infrastructural capacity. So this
is not at issue here. What I do question is the political undertones
surrounding ?inclusion? or ?exclusion? of countries deemed substandard or
backward.
A case in point is Africa?s bid to host the World Cup in 2006, which was
unashamedly compromised by high-ranking officials during the voting process
in favour of Germany but back door diplomacy came to bear early this year
with FIFA awarding South Africa the 2010 bid. The Olympics, on the other
hand are yet to come to the continent and by the high security standards
required, it does not seem that any African capital will qualify to host the
same, guaranteeing the continent?s participant, not host status, for years
to come.
The same could be said with regards to activist forums, which increasingly
are taking a global dimension of their own. The 2003 WSF in Porto Alegre
attracted 100,000 participants and visitors, while Mumbai attracted 80,000.
It is therefore fitting to ask which of our capitals can host a similar
number of visitors who need not only lodging facilities but also an
efficient transport network and state of the art IT facilities to propagate
their advocacy. For sure, South Africa, and some northern African capitals,
will continue to dominate in this respect, amplifying the divide (and
discontent) with the rest of the continent. The way I see it, with South
Africa?s continued dominance economically and facility wise, we will soon
not only be referring to the less developed part of Africa as ?South of the
Sahara? but perhaps qualifying it further as North of the Zambezi!
As I try to understand the threads that define this pattern of exclusion as
it emerges in social movements and other political spaces I weave two
patterns- one being historical and the other being parochial. Being a
feminist from the south and of African ancestry, I see many parallels
between African invisibility (or under representation) in social and
political movements with the gender struggle. Indeed, where women are a
significant majority in most nations they remain absent from most national
and global platforms. Such a situation is unremarkable considering that many
women are excluded from the family, the basic space for political
contestation. Thus, if women remain invisible at the basic site of
participation, it follows that they will be under represented or absent from
public processes and spaces thus perpetrating the continued male dominance
in global and national structures.
What do I weave into the historical?
Some say that history repeats itself. It is ironic that the historic
exclusion of Africans and African nations should demonstrate itself so
starkly in movements that promise to build alternative methods of organizing
and engaging. But then again, it can explain the remnants of colonial legacy
that relegates the continent to insignificance unless to associate it with
vices. This invisibility is hard to understand when one considers that many
countries in Latin America and Asia were also colonized.
Perhaps to understand why Africa still appears to be lagging behind is the
fact African countries never did away with colonialism. Most Latin American
countries on the other hand became independence over a century or more ago.
Likewise most Asian nations preceded Africa in achieving independence with
some going on to launch their own social, cultural and economic revolutions.
Therefore, Africa?s continued experience with colonialism and neo-colonialism
may be responsible for a lingering ?recipient? rather than culture of
initiating. Her paucity of ?intellectually? inclined activists, denies her
of visionary individuals who can shape local and ultimately global agendas.
Moreover, an uninspiring culture of activism discourages activists and
intellectuals with potential, in some cases chasing them to other fields or
continents.
In drawing connections with the historical I think that the issue of race
remains a defining factor in social justice movements. Race was an issue in
the civil rights movement and it continues to be the defining factor in
human rights advocacy, albeit in new ways. Traditional leftist movements,
including workers? unions on the other hand challenged inequality on the
basis of class something feminists criticized. They believed that a class
analysis failed to take into account gender experiences leading to unequal
gender relations being replicated in party and union structures. Instead,
feminists introduce into the discourse the issue of intersectionality, to
understand the different identities of the citizen. The evolution in
discourse came from the continuing engagement with tensions of race, class,
ethnicity and other diversities within the movement. Indeed, in the late
sixties feminism faced a real crisis when black (and to an extent Latino
women) broke away expressing that the dominant discourse did not address
their realities.
However, such tensions appear novel to current people and mass movements.
Indeed, as was the case in the past upper and middle calls white males (and
some women) and intellectuals seem to dominate the leadership and advisory
spaces of mass movements. Even in Latin America where these movements are
strong there is tension between middle class white activists and ?indigenous?
or black populations. India expanded the analysis to not only include class,
but also caste. The Conference Against Racism and Xenophobia Such amplified
existing tensions, which remain fiercely contested. Thus, it may be that the
exclusion of Africa, considered the least developed continent, is but
following a pattern of supremist assertion.
The bigger question for movements and activists thus remains understanding
and achieving inclusion, lest the divide cripples efforts in global action
against neo-colonialism and neo liberal policies. More importantly, it is an
issue for Africans, particularly African activists who need to show some
concern over the state of affairs not only by playing the victim but also by
actively changing their engagement culture with the political. Indeed,
activism is not only an alternative means of survival, nor is it a fad. It
is, in fact, and remains the reaction against emerging and mutating forms of
injustice and anarchy. Our willful disrespect of this fact suggests we are
willing collaborators of unjust policies and systems. Our continued
disengagement, conscious or unconscious, with politicized agendas suggests
we concur with the status quo.
Why parochial? For the most part, we have as activists failed to walk the
talk in our political culture, in our governance structures and in our
inability to connect with the masses something that denies us credibility.
Consequently, activism in most African countries is elitist, if not
opportunist, being largely the purview of NGO, and to a smaller extent the
academe. It is not only class based but defined by age. Thus, whereas Mumbai
was a testament to citizen participation with the majority of participants
coming from rural India and from neighboring countries, the delegations from
African countries, including Tanzania were ?well placed? middle class
activists. Likewise, the presence of youths- be they volunteers or delegates
in the Youth Forum at the WSF was breathtaking while the youth delegation
from Tanzania, included middle age persons!
In a way, this reflects the state of Civil Society in most African countries
and especially Tanzania, a context I am more familiar with. When one tries
to identify civil society in Tanzania; or the shapers and shakers in civil
society, it amounts to a handful of ever-present and over saturated
individuals. At the end there is not much variety in terms of composition or
content in the different activist circles as well as emerging alliances.
Increasingly the ?long timers? have given the term ?exclusion? new meaning
with some claiming the role of the ?God Father? empowered to endorse less
popular or emerging actors on behalf of donors; or simply to preserve their
dominance in a ?chic? sector.
This lack of diversity, depth and daring is paradoxical in a sector that
sees itself as instrumental in promoting and upholding democratic ideals.
Increasingly it is not surprising to find civil society organizations in
Tanzania replicating some of the vices attributed to governments- nepotism
(in the form of regionalism and sectarianism), favoritism, high overhead and
undemocratic leadership. In some cases, visionary leaders have no support
within their organizations, their constituents still suffering from the
hangover of the welfare state, where the state and the charismatic leader
did it all. At best, the masses will whine and criticize about the excesses
they perceive committed by their leaders yet given a chance no one is ready
to make the sacrifices that will propel them to significance.
Thus many committed leaders in the continent experience abandonment, even
when they champion causes others supposedly share. Undoubtedly, activist
organizations and social movements failure to connect with the masses raises
key questions about how we practice participatory development for social
transformation. In such a scenario what added value do we then bring to
practice of alternative organizing and horizontal leadership? More
importantly if this is our reality how then do we propose to garner the
capacity not only to participate at the global scale, but also to shape and
host global action?
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
ICAE ACADEMY OF
LIFELONG LEARNING ADVOCACY
Reflections on ICAE's Academy of Lifelong Learning Advocacy
by Paul Belanger - ICAE President
belanger.paul@uqam.ca
The first ICAE Academy for Lifelong Learning Academy finished
last August 18th.
We are very satisfied to have been able to make this international training
project come true as well as to count with the attendance of key
participants such as adult educators, members of organizations and networks
from different regions around the world that constitute a strong and
powerful group which allow to plan future actions at national, regional and
international level. Twenty participants from Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin
America and Canada did participate, coming from 15 countries. They worked
very hard for three full weeks.
We also benefited from resources person coming from Europe, Latin America,
Asia, UNESCO and the European Union, who, through their key inputs and
knowledge, contributed to the development and achievement of the objectives
of this course, as well as to enrich and promote the exchange of ideas among
participants.
The objective of this residential programme on advocacy for adult learning
was to help educators and social movement activists strengthening their
skills in supporting adult learning for change, and, also, to consolidate
ICAE as a global network committed to that end. We wanted to support the
emergence of a new leadership for the global network of adult educators, and
to secure the regeneration of ICAE and to enhance ICAE?s networking capacity
as a global team committed to the right to learn of women and men.
The programme was structured around three major thematics corresponding to
each of the three weeks:
First week, we worked to generate and share a broader vision on adult
education within the framework of human rights, developing linkages with the
most important globalization issues and actions ( the World Social Forum, in
particular) that are currently affecting the world.
Second week, we focused our work on the necessity and methodology of
monitoring of the right to learn, referring to the different data sources
available at global (e.g. Beijing; Dakar; CONFINTEA, MDG), regional and
national levels.
Third week, the focus has been the creative Participation and
Strategies for Advocacy at all levels and the strengthening of advocacy
network and, in particular, of ICAE and its networks.
Looking back at the expected outcomes, ICAE has all reasons to be satisfied:
* 20 potential leaders have been initiated to
global teamwork and advocacy on lifelong learning and adult learning,
* Enrichment of ICAE?s broader vision on adult education related to
world?s social issues,
* Sensitized participants to the commonalities and the diversity of
the specific experience brought at this Academy: in literacy, health
education, citizenship education, gender justice, popular and citizenship
education, advocacy for adult learning policy, adult learners week, etc.,
* Concrete practice of skills to build and present arguments for
evidence-based advocacy and this in each participant specific national
context
* Identification of new and tested strategies and
approaches to influence policy and policy makers, using old skills in new
ways,
* Concrete exploration with participants to work
in intersectoriality with other collective actions, which is certainly the
most difficult challenge for adult educators.
The type of ICAE that we are building together is one that requires the
exchange and competencies that we have intensively practiced during this
three weeks seminar
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
THE IALLA EXPERIENCE
by Arild Mikkelsen
Principal of Buskerud Folk High School, Norway
The IALLA-experience
Buskerud Folk high school had the honour to host the first ICAE
Academy of Lifelong Learning Advocacy. This was a great experience to us
in many ways. To meet people from all corners of the world is always
exciting and inspirational. The participants of this IALLA-conference
brought with them a lot of deep reflections, courage, ideas for the future,
and not to forget humour and songs, and turned our school into a place of
excitement and good vibrations.
Our school is situated on the peaceful countryside of Norway, people from
more urban places in the world might characterise Darbu as a rather sleepy
place. Most of the folk high schools in Norway are situated in the
countryside, in mountain areas and nearby the fjords, very few in the cities.
We were of course anxious about the quietness of our neighbourhood, and
thought that somebody might find it boring and dull. But the themes and
lectures of the conference created engagement and action, and the
participants worked themselves through three very intensive weeks.
We had arranged a few excursions to a nearby village to see an art
exhibition, to have a four hours boat trip to an old village and to have a
good meal there, a trip to Oslo to meet people in the Educational Ministry,
to watch the Vigeland Sculpture Park, and to do some shopping. In addition
we listened to a jazz concert in a nearby medieval church, had a highly
professional violin and guitar concert in the sitting room of the school,
and concluded the last evening with an outdoor brass band concert which also
included dancing in the bright and sunny August evening. This is meant to
be evident proof of the fact that this conference combined heavy work with
inspirational music and social experiences, and also proving that the
conference became very much folk high school alike.
IALLA made our school important. The mayor of our municipality opened the
conference and gave a lecture, and by doing so strengthened the links
between the school and the municipality. We had journalists from our local
newspapers to interview participants and leading persons from the
secretariat, and the editor of the Norwegian folk high school magazine spent
half a day at the school. All this is important for the school, making us
visible in our municipality in a positive way. The conference received
support both from the municipality and the county, and this was also a
useful experience.
To wind up, the conference has above all given the school an international
network. People from all corners of the world have been here, they have
heard about us, and have experienced for themselves the life in a folk high
school. The more formal contact with ICAE is also very inspirational for us,
and we sincerely hope that the contact might be deepened and strengthened in
the future. Folk high schools need to be pushed out of their Norwegian
isolation. For our school the IALLA-experience reminded us about the
challenges that adult learning face in a globalised world, and we are very
happy for that reminder.
Arild Mikkelsen
Principal of Buskerud Folk high school
CALL FOR APPLICATIONS
APPLICATION
FORM
PROGRAM
|