|
IALLA II - 2005 |
CONVENOR: JOSEFA FRANCISCO |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Monday August 8 |
Tuesday August
9 |
Wednesday
August 10 |
Thursday August
11 |
Friday August 12 |
| 08.00 |
Breakfast |
Breakfast |
Breakfast |
Breakfast |
Breakfast |
| 09.00 |
Orientation to the module, expectations check
& sharing of program flow; learning map; house rules. Implications of shifting terrains & emerging issues arising
from global geopolitics, to our advocacy on adult education. The objective is to engage the participants in a dynamic
discussion on the major challenges and opportunities in the environment that
may have an influence the advocacy of ICAE and of adult educators in
general. |
Report
back on previous day’s discussion. Further questions for clarification (if
any) |
Report
back on previous day’s discussion. Further questions for clarification. (if
any) |
IALLA
Evaluation |
Participants'
departure |
| |
|
|
|
| Input-discussion on strategic advocacy planning: looking at
three-level objectives of advocacy & of different actors (Gigi Francisco) |
Input-discussion:
Steps in formulating an advocacy agenda (Gigi Francisco) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Workshop discussion –
3 groups: national, regional, international This
session introduces the participants to the need for identifying concrete
advocacy objectives in three areas and for mapping the various
actors/players/stakeholders that groups need to take account of in the
context of advocacy at the national, regional and international spheres. |
Workshop: Part
1 One group for global sphere; one
group for national sphere The session allows participants to use various techniques in
identifying an advocacy issue and in formulating a policy solution that they
could advocate on.
Choosing an advocacy issue |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 10.30 |
Coffee/Tea |
Coffee/Tea |
Coffee/Tea |
Coffee/Tea |
|
| 11.00 |
Workshop
discussion (4 groups)
Questions:
(1) How are we addressing these challenges in our adult education
work?
(2) Are we able to integrate our efforts or do our efforts run
parallel to one another (i.e. modules focused on specific concerns)? (3) What
capacities do we need to develop as adult educators so that we can
effectively integrate these new challenges into our work? |
Advocacy objectives: (1)
What is our key policy objective? (2)
What is our key process objective ?
(3)
What is our key civil society objective? |
Workshop:
part 2 One group for global sphere; one group for national sphere Activities: 1.
Checklist of basic questions to ask in formulating a policy solution
2. Content –Structure- Culture Grid |
IALLA
Evaluation |
|
| |
Actors
/ stakeholders:
(1) Who is our “constituency” in our advocacy? (2) Who are
possible targets of our advocacy? (3) Who are
possible “allies”?
(4) Who are possible
“opponents”? |
|
|
|
| Plenary report back & discussion / Overall Synthesis |
From
the mapping exercise, answer the following:
(1) For each of the groups above, identity strategies that can be
used. |
|
|
|
| 13.00 |
Lunch |
Lunch |
Lunch |
Lunch |
|
| 14.30 |
Plenary report back & discussion / Overall
Synthesis Continues previous session |
Input-discussion: assessing your organization’s
capacity for advocacy (Gigi Francisco) |
Plenary presentation & discussion / Overall
synthesis |
Closing ceremony |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| 15.30 |
Coffee/Tea |
15.00 Coffee/Tea |
Coffee/Tea |
Coffee/Tea |
|
| 16.00 |
Roundtable discussion: collective construction
of a new thinking on advocacy for popular education (part 1) The session objective is to facilitate participants’ further
reflection on context, complexity and the world, and to engage them into a
visioning of a new thinking for popular advocacy & action. It requires
activities that will sharpen participants’ understanding of the meaning of
transformation in relation to: (1)
Cultural Diversity (2) Local (distinctive) –global (shared) norms
(New legal paradigm?)
(3) Local-global actions (New politics) From the sharing by
resource persons, reflect on the following:
(1) What new information do we need ?
(2) What new knowledge do we
need? (3) What new understanding have we obtained /should we obtain? (4) What
new values & ethics should we be cultivating? |
Workshop. Similar
organizations will form a group. |
Re-visiting the learning map
Creative group presentations |
|
|
| The
session focuses on assessing our organization’s capacity for advocacy (national, regional and international
spheres). It will cover the areas of (1) Organizational VMO; (2) Internal
Assessment; and (3) External Assessment. |
| Key questions: |
| 1. Why does any organization engage/plan to engage in advocacy |
| 2. Are these reasons for engaging in advocacy consistent with
the VMO of my organization? |
| 3. What does my organization expect to change or attain by
engaging in advocacy? |
| 4. INTERNAL ASSESMENT
(S-W in organization, human resources & material resources) |
| 5.
EXTERNAL ASSESMENT (T-O in relation to: state actors, civil society actors,
market actors/factors and culture. |
| Plenary session & discussion on items 1
to 4 Challenges
and needs identified from the previous exercise |
| Plenary session & discussion on item 5 / Overall synthesis |
| 17:00 Plenary report
back & discussion / Overall
synthesis |
| 19.00 |
Dinner |
Dinner |
Dinner |
Reception |
|
| 20.00 |
|
|
|
Brass
Band |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|